Layered Architecture

A layered architecture is a software design pattern that separates different concerns of a software system into different layers or components, with each layer providing a specific set of services to the layer above it. This separation of concerns helps to maintain the modularity and scalability of the system, as well as to reduce the complexity of the overall design.

In Domain-Driven Design (DDD), a layered architecture is often used to organize the solution domain into different parts. For example, it may consist of a presentation layer, an application layer, a domain layer, and an infrastructure layer. The presentation layer handles user interaction, the application layer implements the use cases and workflows, the domain layer represents the business rules and entities, and the infrastructure layer provides technical services such as persistence, messaging, and security.

Using a layered architecture in DDD helps to ensure that the different parts of the system are well-separated and that the interactions between them are clearly defined. This makes it easier to understand and maintain the system, as well as to extend it in the future as new requirements arise.

Example

An example of a layered architecture can be a web application that consists of the following layers:

1. Presentation layer: This layer is responsible for presenting the user interface to the user. It includes components like controllers, views, and templates.
2. Application layer: This layer is responsible for implementing the use cases or business logic of the application. It includes components like services, use case controllers, and DTOs.
3. Domain layer: This layer is responsible for defining the business rules and domain objects of the application. It includes components like entities, value objects, and domain services.
4. Persistence layer: This layer is responsible for storing and retrieving the data from the database. It includes components like repositories, DAOs, and ORM frameworks.

The flow of data between the layers in a layered architecture is typically unidirectional, where each layer communicates only with the layer directly below or above it.

When to use

The layered architecture is a common architectural pattern that is appropriate in many situations. It is especially useful when building large, complex systems that need to be easily maintainable and scalable.

Some scenarios where a layered architecture can be appropriate include:

1. Large-scale enterprise applications that have many different modules or subsystems.
2. Applications that need to support multiple interfaces, such as web and mobile.
3. Applications that require a high degree of flexibility and modularity, where individual components can be easily swapped out or replaced.
4. Applications that require strict separation of concerns, with clear boundaries between different layers of the system.

In general, a layered architecture can be a good choice when you need to build a system that is easy to understand, maintain, and extend over time. It can help you to keep your code organized and ensure that each layer of the system has a clearly defined responsibility.

When to avoid

The layered architecture may not be appropriate in certain situations, including:

1. Small projects: For small projects with simple requirements, a layered architecture may introduce unnecessary complexity.
2. Projects with frequent changes: If a project requires frequent changes, a layered architecture may make it difficult to modify the application as changes to one layer may affect other layers.
3. Projects with changing requirements: If the requirements of a project are not well understood or are likely to change frequently, a layered architecture may not be the best approach as it can be difficult to modify the application to accommodate changing requirements.
4. Projects that require high performance: A layered architecture may introduce overhead in terms of processing time and memory usage, which can impact the performance of the application.
5. Projects with low complexity: For applications with low complexity, a layered architecture may be overkill and may not provide any significant benefits over a simpler architecture.

Comparison to the vertical slice architecture

The layered architecture and vertical slice architecture are both commonly used in software development, but they differ in their approach to structuring code.

The layered architecture is based on a strict separation of concerns, where each layer has a specific responsibility and communicates only with adjacent layers. Typically, the layers in a layered architecture include the presentation layer, application layer, domain layer, and data layer. This architecture is well-suited for large, complex systems where maintaining separation between components is important.

On the other hand, the vertical slice architecture focuses on organizing code around specific features or functions, with all layers represented in each vertical slice. In this architecture, each slice includes a presentation layer, application layer, domain layer, and data layer, all of which are focused on a specific feature or function. This architecture is well-suited for smaller, more focused systems, and for teams that prioritize rapid development and frequent deployment.

In general, the layered architecture is better suited for large, complex systems where maintainability and scalability are important, while the vertical slice architecture is better suited for smaller, more focused systems where rapid development and frequent deployment are important.

Categories